PHILOSOPHY
OF
SCIENCE
Fall 2008
Dr. Christine A. James
PHIL
3200 A Philosophy of Science MW
2:00pm-3:15pm WH 104 CRN
80770
This syllabus is available online,
and may be updated, at http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/PHILOSOPHYOFSCIENCEFall2008.htm
Office: 110 Ashley Hall
Office Hours: TR 9:15am-11:00am, MW
3:15pm-4:45pm and after classes and by appointment as needed.
Telephone: 259-7609
Mailbox: Philosophy Department Office
Fax: 259-5011
E-mail address: chjames@valdosta.edu
Course
content: This course provides an
introduction to the specialization in philosophy called philosophy of science.
Students will gain an understanding of a variety of perspectives on science:
Does the history of science progress in a predictable, linear, regular way, or
not? Is scientific knowledge as “objective” or “justified” as it claims
to be? Our readings come from various approaches and two separate texts,
each with their own perspective on science as a social and historical
phenomenon. This is a reading intensive course, so it will require you to
read, think about, and write about a considerable amount of material.
Requirements: Class participation and attendance, two written
examinations, two papers, various WebCT Vista assignments and
discussions. Pop Reading Quizzes may also be given during the semester.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
Philosophy
courses at
http://www.valdosta.edu/academic/VSUGeneralEducationOutcomes.shtml
The
Learning Outcomes for PHIL 3200 are:
1. To understand the distinctions among the various approaches to philosophy of science, including positivism, post-modern theory, and the historical nature of science.
2. To recognize how philosophical inquiry applies to ‘real-world’ circumstances and to specific case studies in the history of science.
3. To become conversant with the history of philosophy of science, as well as specific examples of the formation of the community of scholars who study science, and the role of social interaction in how scientists and philosophers of science view their work.
4. To recognize and define different world views, adopting a reasonably viable one and justifying it in a philosophically informed way that emphasizes critical reasoning and argument.
5. To demonstrate the ability to discuss, in both oral and written discourse, the philosophical issues explored in the course.
6. To be familiar with what academic philosophy is, and to understand how it can be applied to daily life as well as specific careers.
Members of the faculty in Philosophy and Religious
Studies have verified that these outcomes are in line with the outcomes of the
course as it is taught at peer institutions in the State System of Georgia.
These course-specific learning outcomes contribute to the
departmental
1. To encourage an understanding of
central issues, topics and philosophers in the history of philosophy, from the
ancient to the modern periods.
2. To develop students’ abilities
to think, write, and speak critically and logically.
3. To enable students to challenge
their own ideas and to develop self-understanding in the context of a diverse
range of ideas which inform contemporary controversies and social conflict.
4. To enable students to engage in
independent philosophical research, and to be responsible for communicating
their understanding of the issues researched and developed, including a working
familiarity with current research methods.
5. To incorporate
philosophical positions in oral and written
6. To critically outline and
analyze a philosophical question.
Required Text:
Not required but good to have:
Copernican Questions, Keith Parsons, MacGraw Hill Publishing Company, 2005, 9780072850208
Be sure to do
the reading before the class for which it is assigned. Please bring the
relevant book(s) and/or article(s) with you to class, along with a designated
notebook and some pens.
(In
addition, Philosophy and Religious Studies faculty encourage you to use Andrea
A. Lunsford, St. Martin’s Handbook, 5th ed. which was required in ENGL
1101 and 1102 courses. These books are available for purchase at the VSU
Bookstore. The
How grades will be calculated:
A
= 100 -
90%
Class participation, attendance = 15%
B
= 89 -
80%
1 Exam = 25%
C
= 79 -
70%
2 Papers at 20% each = 40%
D
= 69 -
60%
1 Presentation = 20%
F
= 59 -
0%
Total = 100%
Please note that I am not obligated
to accept late work or to allow “make up” work after the date an assignment or
exam or paper is completed by the other members of the class.
I also make no promises about extra
credit items, although I will routinely announce events on campus that can
result in some extra credit points for you.
Exams
and Papers: The exam
in our class will be a “short answer” written exam. Usually I ask six
questions, and a complete answer should be no less than four complete
sentences. These exams are “objective” in the sense that the answers can
be directly related to class discussions and the textbook.
http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/papers4800.htm
Here are some extra links, if you would like to use outside sources and secondary source material:
http://books.valdosta.edu/gal1.html (click on “Full Text Journal Title
List”) and
http://www.valdosta.edu/library/learn/guides/philosophy.shtml
The direct link for the database
(Academic Search Complete)
http://www.galileo.usg.edu/express?link=zbac (Click on Academic Search Complete to open the first page with the search box.)
Attendance Policy: I do care that you attend class regularly. As you know, VSU
policy is that missing 20% of class meetings results in an automatic grade of
“F”. Faculty can also institute added attendance policies in their
syllabi. Our class will have a 10% rule for absences. You can miss up to
10% of the class meetings with no grade penalty. 10% of our 30 class
meetings is 3. On absence number 4, your final grade for the course will
be reduced by one whole letter grade; on absence number 5, your final grade for
the course will be reduced by two whole letter grades; on absence number 6, you
will automatically fail the course. Be considerate of your fellow
students – don’t be late, and don’t leave your cell phones and pagers on.
Note that if you are regularly late to class, or leave class early, I will
begin to count each as an absence. Please note that this policy makes no
distinction between excused and unexcused absences.
Special Needs:
Students
requiring classroom accommodations or modification because of a documented
disability should discuss this need with me at the beginning of the
semester. If you are such a student, but you are not registered with the
Access Office, you should contact them too. Students requesting classroom
accommodations or modifications because of a documented disability must contact
the Access Office for Students with Disabilities located in room 1115 Nevins
Hall. The phone numbers are 229-245-2498 (voice) and 229-219-1348 (tty).
Participate!
Once you
arrive at class, make an effort to get involved in the conversation. Don’t
hesitate to ask questions if you need clarification or would like more
information: if you are confused, it is likely that others are too! The
participation percentage you receive will depend on a variety of factors,
including (but not limited to) the frequency and helpfulness of your
contributions to class discussions and the care you take when peer editing.
Pop Reading Quizzes:
If I notice
that there are many students who are not keeping up with the reading and/or
participating in class, I may periodically administer reading quizzes in class.
These will not be announced in advance. No “make-up” quizzes will be given, and
a missed quiz will result in a grade of zero. These quizzes are a solid
reward for attending class, participating, and keeping up with the readings.
Online
Discussions:
During
certain weeks of the semester, you also will be expected to participate
regularly in on-line discussions using WebCT Vista. Use this opportunity to
comment on the week’s readings, ask questions, raise objections, and respond to
what others have written or said in class.
To use
To log in
to Vista and the course “shell,” go to the VSU homepage and click on the words WebCT
Vista in the upper right-hand corner. Your username and password are the
same as for your BlazeNet e-mail account. For instructions on getting started,
go to: http://www.valdosta.edu/vista
and the help pages at http://www.valdosta.edu/vista/guides/start/index.shtml
When posting
in an online bulletin board, like those in the Discussion area of WebCT Vista,
you must (1) post at least one original message of your own, (2) read all the
messages posted by others, and (3) respond substantively to at least one
message from another student. Your postings are due the same day as the
readings are listed in the schedule below (i.e., no later than
Your
first message on a given topic should be about 200 words in length. That is
roughly the length of two medium-sized paragraphs (e.g., this one and the
next). Your second (response) posting can be about half that length, but it
should be substantive (i.e., involving serious content). Try not to
simply repeat what others have said already. Additional postings can be as long
or as short as you desire. Be sure to give the first message an interesting
title in the “Subject” line. This will help alert the rest of us as to what it
will be about.
When you
are ready to respond to someone else, do so by opening their message and
hitting the “Reply” button. This will create a “thread” that others can add on
to. Keep in mind that although it is fine to disagree with what someone else
has said, it is important to do so in a way that is polite and constructive. If
someone says something that makes you angry, pause and take a breath before
firing off a reply! You can preview your message before you send it, but once
you have hit “Post,” your message will no longer be editable.
Academic Honesty:
Members of the
http://www.valdosta.edu/academic/AcademicHonestyPoliciesandProcedures.shtml
http://www.valdosta.edu/academic/documents/ReportofAcademicDishonesty.doc
E-Mail:
VSU
policy mandates that all official communication by e-mail take place through
VSU e-mail accounts or through the WebCT Vista Mail tool. Please check
your VSU (@valdosta.edu) e-mail account regularly.
Note: This
syllabus is not a legal contract; the content of this course is subject to
revision by the professor.
|
|
Schedule
|
|
8/18 M |
Introduction to the class. http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/sciencelabs.htm
(Each date in the class
after this one assumes that you will have read that day’s assigned discussion
reading before class.) What is Philosophy? Do
Philosophy majors get jobs related to that major? Here are two pages to
answer that: |
|
8/20 W |
Discussion of |
|
8/25 M |
Discussion of Ayer, Popper, and
Kuhn which are readings #1, 2, and 3. |
|
8/27 W |
Discussion of modern challenges
to the sanctity of science; Lakatos, Laudan, and |
|
9/1 M |
No Class, Labor Day |
|
9/3 W |
Discussion
of the problem of induction; Hume and Hempel readings 7, 8 |
|
9/8 M |
Discuss Scientific Method
further; Popper, Duhem, Lipton readings 9, 10, 11 |
|
9/10 W |
Discuss
Deductive, Causal, and Pragmatic Models; Hempel, W. Salmon readings 12, 13 |
|
9/15 M |
Special
research night: everyone will be given a specific experiment to research and
report back to the class on 9/17 in a short five-minute presentation.
Some of these experiments will be given to you on slips of paper, others
might come from another book that relates to our class, Parsons’ Coperican
Questions. Our first
reading was an example of how a text could describe one case in the history
of science, explaining the models and images used. You can download it
as a .pdf or view the pages as .jpg images, click on the images to view
larger sizes: http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/philscistart.pdf
http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/pscistart.htm
Also
start to post in the online WebCT Vista Discussion board for our class.
Topics will be listed in the class, under the Discussion tool link. |
|
9/17 W |
Researched experiments discussed,
Review for first exam http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/review1philosophyofscience.htm
http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/review2philosophyofscience.htm
|
|
9/22 M |
First Exam Today by WebCT Vista (Dr.
James will be in |
|
9/24 W |
(Dr. James
will be in Discuss the possibility of a
Unity of Science; |
|
9/29 M |
Discussion of Oppenheim/Putnam
and Fodor readings 17, 18 Consider these examples in the
history of technology as you get ready for the first paper: |
|
10/1 W |
Challenges to the Unity of
Science; Darden/Maull, Dupre, Reisch |
|
10/6 M |
The problem of observation;
Carnap, Hesse,
Hanson
|
|
10/8 W |
Problem solving considering
fallible human senses; Kuhn, Laudan, Latour/Woolgar, Cole; good sites to
check: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationality-historicist/
|
|
10/13 M |
No class, Fall Break |
|
10/15 W |
The issue of gender and science;
Harding, Soble |
|
|
Science and non-traditional
scientists; Sayers, Richards |
|
10/20 M |
First Paper Due, be ready to discuss papers in
class |
|
10/22 W |
Further discussion of
professional life as a scientist; Maxwell and van Fraassen |
|
10/27 M |
Discussion of the
realism/antirealism debate; Churchland, Hacking Are you
anticipating having a job interview? Here’s a document that might help!
http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/jobsearch.pdf http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/jobsearch.doc |
|
10/29 W |
More realism/antirealism;
Fine |
|
11/3 M |
Student Presentation Days Begin Phenomena, Interviewing, and
Discovery; Brown Nazib Khan and Jesse Carter |
|
11/5 W |
Discuss Feyerabend Savanna Drago and Brandy Davis |
|
11/10 M |
Discuss
Dawkins LaTanya Castillo and Patrice
Ancrum |
|
11/12 W |
Science and Religion; McMullin,
Atkins Jackson Dean, Tyler Thomas and
Jessica Gilstrap |
|
11/17 M |
Science and Religion; Gardiner,
Vandegrift Sims Turner, Joe Walden, Greg Bullows |
|
11/19 W |
Current debate in Biology/
Sociobiology; Gould, Caplan Michelle DeLoe, Bill Henderson |
|
11/24 M |
SECOND PAPER DUE in WebCT Vista. (Dr. James will be in Current
debate in Parapsychology; Thouless, Radner/Radner |
|
11/26 W |
No class,
Thanksgiving Break |
|
12/1 M |
Special
presentation day: group will do its own research into either medical ethics,
or science and art Jeff
Goodhand, Jake Daniels, Blake Herrick
|
|
12/3 W |
Special
presentation day: group will do its own research into either medical ethics,
or science and art Kristina
LaPlant, Danielle Costello http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/medicalethics01.pdf http://teach.valdosta.edu/chjames/stemcellethics.pdf |
|
12/8 M |
Last official class day, review
for final exam. |
The last official class day for all
Fall Semester classes is Monday 12/8.
FINAL EXAM:
For a class that normally meets at
2:00, our official exam time is Wednesday, December 10 at 12:30pm-2:30pm in the
usual room.
If you are not sure about how the
final exam times are assigned for your other courses, use this link, and check
the Final Exam Schedule on page 3 of the Registrar’s Fall Guide document:
http://www.valdosta.edu/it/eas/sis/documents/Fall2008FinalExamSchedule.pdf
Special Pilot Project: Online Course Evaluations
This course is part of a pilot project this
semester, testing a new online Student Opinion of Instruction (SOI) form. Student evaluations are extremely important
in helping faculty members plan and revise their courses. Rather than completing these evaluations
during class time, students will need to access evaluation forms via BANNER and
complete them in a period from November 24-December 8, 2008 (the last class
day). You will only complete evaluations
online for the classes that are part of this pilot project; other classes may
still require you to complete a scantron form in class. Please take the time to complete this
important evaluation (or opt out of providing an evaluation) during the
designated period. If you do not do so,
you will not be able to access the grade for this class, scheduled to be posted
on December 15, 2008.
The Administration has not yet set
up the online forms, and Dr. James will update the class with instructions when
they are available.
Tips for doing well in Philosophy
classes, adapted from a handout by Robert Scott
1. Read text with a pencil,
underline the important ideas and key concepts. Write down technical ideas, key
terms, key distinctions between two terms, definitions, diagrams, etc. to help
you remember them.
2. Write questions or
reactions you have to the text in the margin of the book. Ask about these
questions in class, and keep them in mind, since they may provide good points
to make about that author in papers you will write for class.
3. Read ahead to see the
ultimate objectives of the chapter and of the individual readings. Keep
in mind the overall picture of the chapters given in the introductory sections
to each chapter in the book.
4. Work with the new
terminology frequently, and try to apply it to situations outside of
class. I would recommend flash cards to help you memorize the meanings of
new terms quickly.
5. For longer readings, be
sure to review the reading as a whole after you have read it
section-by-section. What was the main question the author wanted to
address? What were the answers? What concepts were used to make the points?
6. When confronted with a
difficult reading or question, break it down into parts, and into individual
ideas. This will at least help to clarify the question, even if it might
not give the answer. And for philosophy, clarifying the question is
really half the battle!
7. Ponder an unsolved problem
and return to it every so often to see if it will give. Inspiration may
happen at an unexpected time, and the subconscious mind does work on problems
even when we aren't consciously aware of it.
8. Begin work on all the
class tasks early, and spread out your work over time so as to maximize your
chances for comprehending the readings accurately, memorizing the information,
and grappling with the questions for papers.
9. If you do need to meet
with an instructor outside of class, be sure to have your questions for the
instructor planned out ahead of time, to make the meeting as productive as
possible.
10. Always think about the
philosophical issues for yourself, rather than waiting to be told what to think
or believe.
11. Study for all exams on a
daily basis, for at least a week before the exam date. You will need to know
who said what, from memory.
12. Try to anticipate the
questions that will be asked on an examination beforehand. Questions may
come from the readings or from lectures and class discussions, but in either
case, certain terms and concepts will be emphasized more than others.
13. Listen carefully to
different points of view, and actively respond (when you read, when you are in
class, and when you write your philosophy papers)!
14. Philosophy involves
skills, like learning to appreciate a good debate, learning to imagine the
world differently than we assume it to be, and appreciating the world with a
sense of wonder.
Richard
Amesbury’s tips about writing in Philosophy and Religious Studies:
(1) A
really great website for students about how to write academic papers is
maintained by the Dartmouth Writing Program:
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/toc.shtml
In addition
to lots of helpful general information, it has special pages on "Writing
the Religion Paper" and "Writing the Philosophy Paper."
(2) A great
website that explains the importance of critically evaluating web resources --
always a problem area for students – is maintained by Robert Harris:
http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm
(3) A third
thing I'm planning to do this semester is to require students to own a copy of
the
Dr. Richard
Amesbury